Atlanta: 404-961-7650
Savannah: 912-651-9967
Phones Answered 24 Hours a Day
HURT BY A DEFECTIVE POLARIS OR OTHER ROV IN GEORGIA?
FIND OUT WHAT YOUR CASE IS WORTH
FREE CONSULTATION – NO OBLIGATION
Why Choose Harris Lowry Manton LLP?
Harris Lowry Manton’s lawyers have been standing up for Georgians injured by defective products, including Polaris vehicles and other ROVs—and delivering life-changing results—for decades.
Over 100 Google Reviews
What to Expect
TALK TO A GEORGIA PRODUCT LIABILITY LAWYER TODAY
Get A Free Consultation
Only Georgia Law Firm to Secure #1 Verdicts in Seven Different Categories
No Upfront Fees – Ever
Decades of Trial Experience
More Eight-Figure Verdicts Than Any Other Georgia Firm
Product Liability Case Results
$47.7 Million
Auto Defect (Sasser v. Ford Motor Company) - Child paralyzed due to defective seat latch.
$40 MILLION
Auto Defect (Mundy v. Ford) - Woman paralyzed after transmission defect.
$16.5 MILLION
Auto Defect (Chhetri v. Michelin) - Wrongful death from defective tire separation.
$10.6 MILLION
Auto Defect (Zakrocki v. Ford) - Injuries from an SUV rollover caused by defects.
*Results are examples of past recoveries. No attorney can guarantee an outcome.
Why Work With Harris Lowry Manton LLP
NO UPFRONT COSTS
You don’t pay unless we win
NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED
Verdicts among the top in Georgia history
WE COME TO YOU
Home, hospital, or virtual consults
QUALITY MEDICAL SUPPORT
Connect with doctors who treat now, get paid later
PRIVACY GUARANTEED
Your case stays confidential
TRIAL-READY STRENGTH
Our attorneys are courtroom-tested and unafraid to take on major corporations, like Polaris
START YOUR CLAIM TODAY
Georgia law places strict deadlines on filing product liability lawsuits. Don’t wait until it’s too late. Contact Harris Lowry Manton now to protect your rights.
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING DISCLAIMER:
In some jurisdictions, content on this website may constitute as an Advertisement: The content provided on this website constitutes advertising material. It has been created for the sole purpose of general informational use and should not be interpreted as legal advice or a legal opinion concerning any particular facts or situations. Each legal case is distinctive and requires individualized consideration.